Brandon Vogt

Answering the Best Arguments for Same-Sex Marriage


Last week I was excited to learn that two articles I wrote together earned a First Place award for Best Coverage of Marriage at the annual Catholic Press Association conference. Woohoo!

I completed them last January as part of a special section on “same-sex marriage” for the Our Sunday Visitor Newsweekly.

The first article responded to the ten most common arguments for “same-sex marriage.” You’ve likely heard many of these from friends, family members, co-workers, and commenters around the Internet. The arguments I cover include:

  1. Marriage has evolved throughout history, so it can change again.
  2. “Same-sex marriage” is primarily about equality.
  3. Everyone has the right to marry whomever he or she loves.
  4. “Same-sex marriage” won’t affect you, so what’s the big deal?
  5. “Same-sex marriage” will not lead to other redefinitions.
  6. If same-sex couples can’t marry because they can’t reproduce, why can infertile couples marry?
  7. Children will not be affected since there is no difference between same-sex parents and opposite-sex parents.
  8. Opposition to same-sex marriage is based on bigotry, homophobia, and religious hatred.
  9. The struggle for “same-sex marriage” is just like the civil rights movement of the 1960s.
  10. “Same-sex marriage is inevitable,” so we should “stand on the right side of history.”

It’s important to note that the article concerns civil marriage—marriage as defined and promoted by the state. It doesn’t deal with the Church’s sacramental understanding, although the two often overlap. Second, the responses to the arguments are emphatically nonreligious. They don’t depend on any sacred text or divine revelation. They’re based on reason, philosophy, biology and history. Third, the article only refutes arguments in favor of “same-sex marriage.” It doesn’t touch upon the many positive arguments supporting traditional marriage.

Also, the article is not an attack on people with same-sex attractions. All people, regardless of sexual orientation, deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. Instead, the article is a rational look at whether we should redefine civil marriage, an institution that touches all people and cultures.

Read the full article.


In addition to the piece above, I also contributed an introductory article for the newsweekly and an interview with Princeton professor Robert George. Check them out below:

Finding good answers in the “same-sex marriage” debate

In this I explain how Chick-Fil-A and Facebook led me to write about such a volatile subject:

If you simply accept marriage today as between one man and one woman, or disagree with the idea of “same-sex marriage” even for legitimate reasons, you’re unequivocally branded a hateful bigot. This emotionally charged atmosphere makes rational discussion nearly impossible. Political slogans, sound-bites, tribal divisions, and name-calling drown out real arguments and leave little room for charity and clear-thinking….
More than ever Catholics need simple, rational, non-religious reasons to reinforce their arguments against “same-sex marriage.”


My Interview with Professor Robert George

Robert George is one of my great intellectual heroes so I was excited to talk with him about marriage. George is a visiting professor at Harvard Law School and professor of jurisprudence at Princeton University.

Robert GeorgeHe’s also an expert on marital law and a strong advocate of traditional marriage. Along with Sherif Girgis and Ryan T. Anderson, George co-authored a new book titled, What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense (Encounter Books). It’s based on their renowned academic paper on the same topic that appeared in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.

Professor George and I spoke about the book, his work, and the main arguments surrounding same-sex marriage.

In a sidebar for the main article I also recommend three helpful books on the topic of “same-sex marriage”:




What are the most common arguments you’ve heard for “same-sex marriage”?


  • Victoria DePalma

    Are you
    *currently* being sent into Hell forever … automatically
    excommunicated (outside) of God’s Catholic Church ?

    Yes you are … you can reverse it … please continue.

    of Florence, Session 8, 22 Nov 1439 — infallible Source of Dogma
    “Whoever wills to be saved, before all things it is
    necessary that he holds the Catholic faith. Unless a person keeps
    this faith whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish

    You must
    believe the Catholic Dogma to be in the Church … Dogma you have
    *never* seen.

    Site > … infallible Dogma throughout.

    Catholic Faith *is not* Bible interpretation … it is the Catholic
    infallible Sources of Dogma. The Catholic Church didn’t even define
    the Bible’s New Testament Canon until 397 A.D. at the Council of

    – – – –

    Can a
    group which enforces the opposite, the opposite, and the opposite of
    the Catholic unchangeable Dogma be the Catholic Church?

    No, it
    cannot possibly be the Catholic Church … and promotion of the
    opposite of the Catholic Dogma is exactly what the vatican-2 heretic
    cult does … and has been doing since it’s founding on 8 December
    1965 at the Vatican.

    vatican-2 heresy does not have the Office of the Papacy … only the
    Catholic Church has the Papacy.

    The Dogma
    cannot “change” or be “reversed” … God does not “change”.

    founding documents of the vatican-2 heretic cult … the “vatican-2
    council” documents … have well over 200 heresies *against* prior
    defined unchangeable Dogma. Every (apparent) bishop at the “council”
    approved the mountain of heresy, which caused their automatic
    excommunication, see Section 13.2 of the below site.

    – – – –

    12 > Anti-Christ vatican-2 heresies (50 listed) … followed by
    many Catholic corrections.

    13 and 13.1 > Photographic *proof* of heresy at the Vatican.

    of … the Catholic Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy or
    for physical participation in a heretic cult (such as the v-2 cult) …

    … we
    were all placed, body and soul, *outside* of Christianity (the
    Catholic Church) on 8 December 1965 … the close date of the

    13.2 > Catholic Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy or
    participating in a heretic cult such as … vatican-2, lutheran,
    methodist, evangelical, etc.

    107 > St. Athanasius (died 373 A.D.) … “Even if the Church
    were reduced to a handful …” – – during the “arian” heresy
    … we are there again, but worse.

    13.3 > Matt 16:18, Gates of Hell scripture … is *not* about the
    Office of the Papacy … four Dogmatic Councils defined it … that
    heresy will not cause the Dogma to disappear.

    13.4 > The vatican-2 heretic cult does not have the Office of the
    Papacy only the Catholic Church has the Papacy.

    13.6 > The Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Automatic
    Excommunication for heresy define that … God has allowed Catholic
    Jurisdiction … for Mass and Confession to disappear from the world.
    There is no such thing as Catholic Mass outside of the Catholic

    heresies such as “vatican-2”, “sspx”, “sspv”, “cmri”,
    etc. … do not have Catholic Mass.

    19.1 > Dogma on Abjuration for *re-entering* Christianity (the
    Catholic Church) … after being automatically excommunicated. A
    Formal Abjuration is provided here also.

    10.2 > Returning to a state of grace, in places and times when
    Confession is not available, like now.

    – – – –

    Council of Constantinople, 553 A.D. — infallible Source of
    Dogma >
    “The heretic, even though he has not been
    condemned formally by any individual, in reality brings anathema on
    himself, having cut himself off from the way of truth by his heresy.”

    John Eudes, died 1680 >

    greatest evil existing today is heresy, an infernal rage which hurls
    countless souls into eternal damnation.”

    you must know, believe, and do to get to Heaven is on > >


    Our Lady
    of Conquest

    Pray for

© 2019 Brandon Vogt