I just returned home from the 38th Annual G.K. Chesterton Conference, held this past weekend (August 1-3) in Kansas City, KS. It was the largest Chesterton gathering ever, with over 500 attendees from around the world, some as far as Kenya, India, and Chile.
Rod Dreher offered the keynote, speaking on his much-discussed “Benedict Option” and its connection to Chesterton. Dale Ahlquist, president of the Society of G.K. Chesterton, followed with a talk on “The Chesterton Option”.
We also welcomed Cardinal Thomas Collins, Archbishop of Toronto, a longtime Chestertonian who gave a splendid talk on the ways Chesterton has influenced his life and ministry.
I myself presented on “Chesterton as Husband…and Father” and led a panel discussion about “Catholicism and Harry Potter” (both talks will hopefully be online soon).
The three-day conference was packed with invigorating talks, discussions, book vendors, music, and of course beautiful liturgies. The excitement was palpable.
However, there was one moment of disappointment. The first evening, Dale read a letter he received from Bishop Peter Doyle of the Diocese of Northampton, England, announcing that after a lengthy period of investigation, Bishop Doyle has decided not to open the cause of canonization for G.K. Chesterton.
In other words, he doesn’t think Chesterton should be recognized as a saint.
He gave three specific reasons why:
- “There is no local cult”
- The Bishop’s inability “to tease out a pattern of personal spirituality”
- “The issue of anti-Semitism” in Chesterton’s writings
Needless to say, the whole room was crestfallen. Virtually every person in the room was convinced Chesterton’s life was marked by heroic sanctity, and that he’s a saint for our time. Dale acknowledged the disappointment, but he was quick to observe that although the letter had only then become public knowledge, he had actually received it back in April, and that he and the Society had already been exploring alternative paths to sainthood for Chesterton.
Below, you’ll find Dale Ahlquist’s full statement about the cause and these developments, including a response to each of Bishop Doyle’s three reasons.
Like Dale, I’m very confident this is not the end of Chesterton’s cause, but only the beginning. I remain convinced the cause will open within my lifetime.
For if Chesterton is a saint, as I truly believe, then the Gamaliel principle will hold: “If this endeavor is of human origin, it will destroy itself. But if it comes from God, you will not be able to destroy [it]; you may even find yourselves fighting against God.”
(Full disclosure: I’m on the board of the Society of G.K. Chesterton and involved in some of the activities surrounding the cause.)
G.K. Chesterton Should Be Numbered Among the Saints
Statement from Dale Ahlquist President, Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota (August 5, 2019 – Feast of Our Lady of the Snows)
On August 1, 2019, at the 38th Annual Chesterton Conference, held this year in Kansas City, I read to the 500 attendees the following letter from Bishop Peter Doyle of Northampton, England:
… This is not a letter I find easy to write, and I know that you will not find it easy to receive.
As you know, Canon John Udris completed a preliminary investigation into the cause of G K Chesterton last summer. Since that time, I have consulted on John’s findings, a wonderfully thorough and supportive study, and I have prayed much about the issue. I also went with some of the Bishops of England and Wales to see the Congregation for the Cause of Saints during our Ad Limina visit in the last week of September 2018.
I am very conscious of the devotion to G K Chesterton in many parts of the world and of his inspiring influence on so many people, and this makes it difficult to communicate the conclusion to which I have come.
That conclusion is that I am unable to promote the cause of G K Chesterton for three reasons. Firstly, and most importantly, there is no local cult. Secondly, I have been unable to tease out a pattern of personal spirituality. And, thirdly, even allowing for the context of G K Chesterton’s time, the issue of anti-Semitism is a real obstacle particularly at this time in the United Kingdom.
As a very unworthy servant of the Church, I recognise Chesterton’s goodness and his ability to evangelise but, in my heart of hearts, I believe that he himself would not want any fuss other than asking his prayers for the Church today and praying for him.
I realise that this is very disappointing for you and for the vast number of people around the world who have such a high regard for Chesterton, and I think particularly of the American Chestertonian Society.
I have no doubt that you will seek new ways to promote Chesterton’s cause, and I would not want to stand in the way other than stating, as the local Bishop, my own conclusions.
Be sure of my prayers for you and your family and for the Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton and the Chesterton Schools Network.
With every blessing
Yours sincerely in Christ
Bishop of Northampton
Although I had received this letter back in April, this was the first public mention of it. The next day the Catholic Herald in England reported the story, and the Catholic press around the world picked it up.
In my reply to the Bishop, I expressed my sympathy for the difficulty of his task and told him I was indeed disappointed but not discouraged. I added that Chestertonians would, as he predicted, continue to do everything we can to promote Chesterton’s canonization. I did add that no saint would ever endorse his own cause, least of all, the humble bard of Beaconsfield. The bishop immediately responded agreeing with that last point.
Just before the conference, I wrote to him and told him that we would be discussing this issue at our conference, and I asked for his prayers. He responded and said he would say a Mass for the conference and the Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton.
I would like – as succinctly as possible – to address the Bishop’s objections because they will be important to others as well.
First, there is a local cult. It was the Senior Deacon (now deceased) of the Diocese of Northampton who first appealed to the Bishop to open Chesterton’s cause, saying, “We need his holiness.” There is a group based in London called The Catholic Chesterton Society, led by Stuart McCullough, whose conversion story is told in our recent book My Name is Lazarus: 37 Stories of Converts Whose Path to Rome was Paved by G.K. Chesterton. Every June, pilgrims walk and pray from London to Beaconsfield, culminating at Chesterton’s grave. The Catholic Chesterton Society has translated the prayer for Chesterton’s intercession into more than 20 languages.
There is also a universal cult. We have distributed over 25,000 prayer cards, and we get daily requests for more. The cult is growing and does not show any signs of slowing down. People all over the world are devoted to Chesterton, asking for his intercession because they have been touched and transformed by his wisdom and goodness. He brings people to Christ.
The second objection – the lack of a clear pattern of spirituality – reveals the difficulty of getting a lay person canonized. At the conference I stumped the audience when I gave them five names and asked what the five people had in common. It turns out they all had lived during Chesterton’s time, they had all been Catholic priests, they had all founded religious orders, and they were all canonized within the last 30 years. And no one knew who they were. Clearly, there is little difficulty in discerning the spiritual pattern, as it were, of the founder of a religious order. But G.K. Chesterton did not write about his own spiritual life, and he did not found a religious order, telling his followers how they should live. Rather, he revealed his spirituality in his writings and in his life, in his love for the Sacraments, in his abiding sense of wonder and joy, and in his tireless labor for social and political reform. He lived a theology of thanks. He is the model of lay spirituality.
I might add that I have been giving retreats based on Chesterton’s very coherent spirituality for some years.
The third objection is the most disappointing because it has been addressed repeatedly, including by great scholars of Chesterton and his time. Chesterton was not anti-Semitic. A man who not only physically defended the Jews when they were attacked (read his Autobiography) but repeatedly spoke out against their persecution in Germany, in Russia, and in England, who said “The world owes God to the Jews,” and “I will die defending the last Jew in Europe,” should not have this poisonous epithet anywhere near his good name. I am pleased that the Bishop does not make the accusation, but he says that there is an “issue.” While Chesterton’s writings are amazingly fresh and vital, there is no question that he occasionally says things that are awkward by our modern standards of political correctness (and the Bishop makes this allowance as well). However, an issue being “sensitive” should not stand in the way of proceeding with the Cause. It simply needs to be dealt with honestly, fairly, courageously and charitably. In addition to the fact that there are many Jewish converts, drawn to the faith by none other than G.K. Chesterton, I wish to emphasize that there is not a wisp of hostility toward the Jews in our Apostolate. We are saddened when anyone repeats the falsehood that Chesterton was anti-Semitic.
It is fitting that Chesterton, who made a living as a controversialist, should continue to find himself controversial. But if anything, that is proof of his abiding presence. It is also evidence that he belongs in that controversial group, the Communion of the Saints.
My recent book Knight of the Holy Ghost: A Short History of G.K. Chesterton addresses these issues more fully and makes a strong case for Chesterton’s sanctity. I have previously sent both this book and My Name is Lazarus to the Bishop.
While Bishop Peter Doyle was always gracious and kind to me, I was aware of the fact that he did not have any enthusiasm for Chesterton and by his own admission did not really know much about him. Although I tried to give him the knowledge, I could not give him the enthusiasm. It was my hope that the Prophet would be honored in his own country. Although it is clear Bishop Doyle will not be opening the Cause of Canonization for G.K. Chesterton, this does not mean the cause is dead. We are confident that, in time, it will open, under a different ordinary and perhaps in a different diocese, which is a possibility under canon law.
In the meantime, we ask that those who are disappointed by the announcement to be charitable and supportive of the Bishop of Northampton. He is praying for us. Let us return the favor.
Dr. Dale Ahlquist
President, Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton
Co-Founder, Chesterton Academy
ABOUT THE SOCIETY OF GILBERT KEITH CHESTERTON
The Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton is a Catholic lay apostolate, recognized formally as a canonical private association of the Christian faithful. The mission of the Society is to promote Catholic education, evangelization, and the social teaching of the Church. To help carry out its mission, the Society sponsors organizations including schools in the growing Chesterton Schools Network, and the missionary organization, Teach for Christ. Learn more at Chesterton.org.
For more information, to request a review copy of Knight of the Holy Ghost: A Short History of G.K. Chesterton, or to schedule an interview with Dale Ahlquist, please contact Emily de Rotstein (651-757-9613 or [email protected]), executive director of the Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton.
Do you want to support G.K. Chesterton’s cause? We created a new webpage at the Society of G.K. Chesterton called “Candles for Gilbert” where you can light a digital candle to signal your devotion. You’ll also see a map of Chesterton supporters from around the world who have lit candles alongside you. Check it out!